Talk:The Flash season 6

Flash Episode Title

See talk:Arrowverse#Flash Episode Title. DonQuixote (talk) 14:49, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Source

Thank you for your revert, YoungForever. Could your please explain me, why www.cbr.com link that I've been provided is not a source, still it appears as a source in other refs in this article? What is the difference? IKhitron (talk) 15:53, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

The cbr.com link is a reliable source. Netflix note [1] wasn't a reliable source. I was only referring to the Netflix note. — YoungForever^(talk) 16:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

So, YoungForever, why did you reverted my edits, instead of moving special:diff/924712617 out of the comments? Thank you. IKhitron (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

I didn't notice that you added the cbc.com link as a reliable source because the link wasn't showing up on the article. It was only showing the Netflix note. — YoungForever^(talk) 16:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

I see, YoungForever. Well, thank you for your help. I'm going to remove Netflix now and put the links as sources. IKhitron (talk) 16:17, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Done, in both articles. Removed also the date in Supergirl, because it's only in Netflix, not in CBR. Thanks again, YoungForever. IKhitron (talk) 16:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

I've removed the content and source, as it sources SpoilerTV itself, which the Television WikiProject has come to the consensus that SpoilerTV is not a reliable source. -- /Alex/₂₁ 22:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Don't you think that in this particular case you can trust it, if cbr does, and also the Netflix confirms it - it's not a source, ok, but it is reliable? IKhitron (talk) 22:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

We can't trust SpoilerTV. It's not a matter of who or what, WP:TV agrees that SpoilerTV is an unreliable source. There's WP:NORUSH to add what can be reliably sourced through press releases in the future. -- /Alex/₂₁ 22:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

SpoilerTV is not a reliable source because it is a fan-operated website. — YoungForever^(talk) 23:02, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

I see. And how will you know that the press release is already exists? There will not be the same article again, with another source. And what about the other sources - imdb, tvmaze, thetvdb, tvtime, next-episode.net, screenrant. IKhitron (talk) 23:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

The press release will be accessible through The Futon Critic, just as all the currently-listed episodes are sourced through The Futon Critic. See here - the TBA will be replaced with a link to the episode's press release when it becomes available. And I believe that non of those sites are reliable sources, as they are all WP:USERGEN. See also WP:CITINGIMDB. -- /Alex/₂₁ 23:08, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Weird. Thanks for the explanations. IKhitron (talk) 23:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

imdb, tvmaze, thetvdb, tvtime, next-episode.net all are not reliable sources. Screenrant is the only reliable source (as this is entertainment news website with a team of staff members ) that you mention above. If Screenrant sources from an unreliable source, then it would not be a reliable source. — YoungForever^(talk) 23:17, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

The Last Temptation of Barry Allen as a Wikipedia Article

After Part 2 comes out, I feel like there should be an article for The Last Temptation of Barry Allen (both parts). Part 1 had great reviews and probably deserves an article if Part 2 follows through on how amazing people say the episode is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.244.136.143 (talk • contribs)

I've started a draft at Draft:The Last Temptation of Barry Allen. You are welcome to come help nurture the article's development there, until such time that it is ready for inclusion in the mainspace. - Brojam (talk) 01:02, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Pages that are based on a TV episode should have a bigger and more detailed summary than what is shown in the season's episode table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.157.184.176 (talk) 00:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Brojam, do you feel like it's ready? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:6F10:1960:ACFB:DC6C:A09A:9930 (talk) 21:20, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Efrat Dor might not be a regular

Over here, she is listed as "guest star", and she did not even appear in "Marathon". So this source may be used to shift her to "Recurring" or "guest" if necessary. --Kailash29792 (talk) 09:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Pipe bracket errors

It would be great if we could avoid using broken bracket links like [[#epX|]] with nothing between the pipe and the end brackets, even if it's in code that's commented out. this makes it harder to find the real errors with searches like this one. thank you. Frietjes (talk) 21:58, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

David Singh

Hi. Please see "Patrick Sabongui as David Singh[27] and Mirror David Singh". David Singh as a character does not appear in the referenced episode, and I did not see any source that he appeared at the current season at all, it is still a secret if it was him in 615. Maybe he appeares in this week episode, and maybe he does not appear at all in this season, because of covid shortening. Anyway, I think that this source is irrelevant. And also, if the artist appears twice or three times in the season, should he be recurrent? Thank you. IKhitron (talk) 11:11, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Recurring is defined as four episodes in this article, and I think it's safe to call him both for now unless we get confirmation any way. I think it is likely that he was switched around the same time that the character changed his mind on letting Joe investigate the Mole and Carver within the department, but that's just my own opinion on when the swap happened. --Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 20:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Recurring role or recurring artist? Because if there is still a possibility of recurring artist, there were three until now, and one episode left, but if your guess is right, looks like neither of both heros appears four times in this season. IKhitron (talk) 22:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)